Photo of author

By Gurmail Singh

IPL 2025 GT Defeated By CSK By 83 Runs

IPL 2025 GT Defeated By CSK By 83 Runs: In the IPL 2025 match on May 25, 2025, at Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad, Chennai Super Kings (CSK) defeated Gujarat Titans (GT) by 83 runs. CSK, batting first, posted 230/5, driven by fifties from Devon Conway (52) and Dewald Brevis (57), with contributions from Ayush Mhatre and Urvil Patel.

GT, chasing 231, crumbled to 147 in 18.3 overs, with Sai Sudharsan scoring 41. CSK’s bowlers dominated, with Anshul Kamboj (3/13) and Noor Ahmad (3/21) taking three wickets each, Ravindra Jadeja (2/17) grabbing two, and Khaleel Ahmed (1/17) and Matheesha Pathirana (1/29) claiming one each. Prasidh Krishna (2/22) was GT’s best bowler. This loss hurt GT’s top-two hopes, while CSK ended their season on a high despite a 10th-place finish. Dewald Brevis was named Player of the Match.

IPL 2025 GT Defeated By CSK By 83 Runs

CSK bowling strategy

In the IPL 2025 match where Chennai Super Kings (CSK) defeated Gujarat Titans (GT) by 83 runs on May 25, 2025, CSK’s bowling strategy was pivotal in restricting GT to 147 while defending 231.

Here’s an analysis of their approach based on available details:

☆ Early Powerplay Aggression: CSK opened with pace and spin to exploit the powerplay restrictions. Khaleel Ahmed likely started with the new ball, focusing on swing and seam movement to challenge GT’s openers. His figures of 1/17 suggest he maintained tight lines, aiming to induce early breakthroughs by targeting the stumps or forcing edges.

☆ Spin Domination in the Middle Overs: CSK heavily relied on spinners to control the middle phase. Ravindra Jadeja (2/17) and Noor Ahmad (3/21) were central to their strategy, bowling disciplined lengths to exploit the large boundaries at Narendra Modi Stadium. Jadeja’s accuracy and ability to vary pace disrupted GT’s batting rhythm, while Noor’s left-arm wrist-spin, with its googlies and sharp turn, dismantled the middle order. Their combined five wickets choked GT’s scoring rate, preventing partnerships.

☆ Anshul Kamboj’s Breakthrough Role: Anshul Kamboj (3/13) was a standout, likely used in short, sharp bursts to target key GT batsmen. His ability to bowl tight lines and extract bounce on the Ahmedabad pitch made him effective, especially against GT’s middle order, which struggled to counter his pace and movement.

☆ Matheesha Pathirana’s Death Bowling: Pathirana (1/29) was likely deployed in the later overs to close out the innings. His slingy action and yorker-heavy approach aimed to restrict GT’s lower order from launching a late counterattack, ensuring CSK maintained pressure until the end.

☆Adaptability to Conditions: CSK tailored their strategy to the pitch, which offered some assistance to spinners and disciplined pacers. By mixing spin-heavy middle overs with pace at the start and end, they kept GT’s batsmen guessing, preventing them from settling into a rhythm.

GT batting strategy

In the IPL 2025 match on May 25, 2025, where Gujarat Titans (GT) were defeated by Chennai Super Kings (CSK) by 83 runs at Narendra Modi Stadium, GT’s batting strategy in chasing 231 can be inferred from the match outcome and available details.

Here’s an analysis of their approach: Aggressive Powerplay Intent: GT likely aimed to maximize the powerplay, targeting CSK’s opening bowlers, possibly Khaleel Ahmed and others, to set a strong foundation for the chase. With openers like Sai Sudharsan (41) leading the charge, GT would have looked to score quickly while field restrictions were in place, aiming to reduce the required run rate early. However, early wickets, as indicated by their collapse to 147, suggest CSK’s bowlers disrupted this plan.

☆ Building Partnerships in the Middle Overs: GT’s strategy in the middle overs likely focused on stabilizing the innings through key batsmen like Sudharsan and possibly Shubman Gill or David Miller. The aim was to form partnerships to keep up with the climbing run rate while preserving wickets for a late assault. However, CSK’s spinners, particularly Ravindra Jadeja (2/17) and Noor Ahmad (3/21), throttled this plan by breaking partnerships and dismissing key batsmen, leading to a middle-order collapse.

Targeting Specific Bowlers: GT might have planned to attack CSK’s less experienced bowlers, such as Anshul Kamboj (3/13), to boost the scoring rate. However, Kamboj’s disciplined bowling and ability to exploit the pitch’s bounce thwarted this approach, as GT struggled to counter his accuracy and the spin threat.

Late-Order Acceleration: With a high target, GT’s lower order, possibly including players like Rashid Khan or Rahul Tewatia, would have been tasked with aggressive hitting in the death overs against bowlers like Matheesha Pathirana (1/29). However, the early loss of wickets meant the lower order faced an uphill task, and they couldn’t execute this phase effectively, folding in 18.3 overs.

Misreading Pitch and Conditions: GT’s batting strategy may have underestimated the pitch’s assistance to spinners and disciplined pacers. The large boundaries at Ahmedabad required a more calculated approach, but GT’s aggressive intent likely led to risky shots, resulting in their downfall against CSK’s varied bowling attack.

IPL 2025 Mumbai Indians’ Thrilling Win

Overall, GT’s strategy of an aggressive start, stabilizing partnerships, and a late surge faltered due to CSK’s disciplined bowling, particularly the spin duo of Jadeja and Noor, combined with Kamboj’s breakthroughs. The inability to adapt to the pitch and counter CSK’s bowling led to GT being bowled out for 147, falling short by 83 runs.

Follow US ON Facbook

Leave a Comment